ABS and Capital Markets: A Return to Structured Aviation Finance
# #
# #
20 Feb 2026

ABS and Capital Markets: A Return to Structured Aviation Finance

Funding options are widening again, but investors want clarity. After a few years where aviation risk was either priced defensively or avoided entirely in public markets, Asset-Backed Securities are back in the conversation as a practical funding tool. The shift is not sentimental. It is structural. Portfolios that can be explained cleanly, serviced consistently, and reported without grey areas are getting real attention.

This matters in 2026 because capital markets funding is not relationship-driven funding. It is evidence-driven funding. When disclosure is strong, execution risk falls and pricing can tighten. When disclosure is weak, spreads widen quickly and the structure starts to feel like hard work for expensive money.

The takeaway is simple: clean data and disciplined structures are the ticket to cheaper capital. Aviation market commentary in early 2026 also points to a strong pipeline for further deals, building on the rebound in 2025.

 

What is aviation Asset-Backed Security, and why is it back now?

An Asset-Backed Security (ABS) is a debt instrument where investors are repaid from the cashflows generated by a pool of assets, rather than from a single company’s general balance sheet. In aviation, the pool is typically aircraft leases, aircraft loans, or related receivables packaged into a structure designed for capital markets investors.

This is back now because the market has re-opened in size. Industry reporting shows aviation ABS issuance in 2025 returning strongly, with deal volume around the $10bn mark and repeat issuers coming back into public markets.

The mechanics behind the shift are practical:

  • A deeper investor base has returned to the product
  • More performance history exists across cycles, including stress periods
  • Structures are better tested and more standardised than pre-pandemic
  • Platforms are treating securitisation as a repeatable channel, not a one-off event

What this means commercially is straightforward: ABS is increasingly a funding option again, but only where the portfolio can be presented as a controlled, measurable set of cashflows.

 

What does “investors want clarity” actually mean in 2026?

“Clarity” is not a vibe. It is the ability for an investor to validate what is being bought, how it performs, and how it behaves when something goes wrong. In the current market narrative, investors are also more focused on who services the assets and whether incentives are aligned between equity and servicing.

That shows up in a few consistent expectations:

  • Stable definitions across reporting packs (no shifting metrics quarter to quarter)
  • Visibility on servicing capability, controls, and escalation process
  • Evidence that documentation is complete and audit-ready
  • Concentration that is understood and bounded, not discovered late
  • A structure that protects seniors clearly if performance weakens

The end result is that the “portfolio story” needs to be provable in hours and days, not debated over weeks.

 

What clean data do structured investors expect before spreads tighten?

Clean data is not about having more spreadsheets. It is about reducing uncertainty so that credit and cashflow modelling is quick, consistent, and repeatable. In practice, this is where pricing is won or lost because uncertainty behaves like a hidden risk premium.

The evidence investors typically want falls into a short checklist:
 

Data item

What it proves

Asset schedule completeness

Exactly what is in the pool and what condition it is in

Lease and loan term summary

Rent, maturity, triggers, and obligations are standardised

Collections history

How cash actually behaved, not how it was forecast

Arrears and remedy logic

When issues appear, how quickly they become visible and actionable

Maintenance and records position

Whether redelivery and remarketing friction is likely

Concentration map

Exposure by aircraft type, geography, and counterparty

 

Once this is clean, the conversation changes. The focus shifts from “can this be trusted?” to “how tight can this be priced?”

 

How does an aviation ABS structure work: Special Purpose Vehicle, tranches, and the waterfall?

Most securitisations start with a Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV). A Special Purpose Vehicle is an entity created specifically to acquire assets and issue debt secured by those assets. It may issue multiple classes of debt with different payment priority, commonly called tranches, and the rules governing distributions are set out through a priority of payments often referred to as a cashflow waterfall.

The structure works because key risks are controlled through defined rules:

  • Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) holds the pool and issues the notes
  • Tranches separate senior and junior risk, with senior paid first
  • Waterfall rules dictate how collections are distributed and what happens in stress
  • Servicer and trustee roles are appointed to run collections and governance processes
  • Triggers and limits can redirect cash or restrict actions if performance weakens

After the structure is set, the real test is whether it reduces uncertainty rather than hiding it. If the structure is disciplined, it becomes a repeatable funding channel. If it is messy, it becomes a one-time event with a higher spread.

 

What is a warehouse facility, and why does it matter before securitisation?

A warehouse facility is a short-term funding structure used to build the pool before issuing public ABS. It allows assets to be accumulated to the right size, diversity, and performance shape, rather than issuing too early with a small or uneven portfolio. In market commentary, banks are often described as focusing on “warehouse-to-ABS” style business because it generates fee-driven activity and supports repeat issuance pipelines.

This matters because timing is real in capital markets:

  • Pools can be built deliberately, not rushed
  • Diversity can be improved before ratings and investor scrutiny
  • Early performance can be tracked in a consistent reporting format
  • Issuance can be timed to market windows rather than asset availability

Warehousing is not a side note. It is often the stage where discipline is proven and where a platform earns the right to repeat the product.

 

What challenges price the deal wider: concentration, disclosure pressure, and macro-driven spreads?

ABS pricing is not only about whether the pool is “good.” It is about how the pool behaves under stress and how much uncertainty exists around that behaviour. On top of asset and counterparty risk, macro conditions drive spread moves, meaning a strong pool can still price wider in the wrong window.

The main challenges investors keep coming back to are consistent:

  • Disclosure expectations are rising, especially around servicing and documentation quality
  • Asset concentration risk, where too much exposure sits in one aircraft type, one region, or one counterparty
  • Remarketing friction, where records and redelivery position create longer downtime
  • Macro-driven spread volatility, where risk appetite changes even if pool performance is stable
  • Alignment questions, where incentives between equity and servicing are unclear

The practical implication is that spreads tighten when uncertainty is reduced, not when marketing language improves.

 

Which performance metrics are being tied to funding terms and investor confidence?

Structured investors rely on performance metrics because they act as early warning signals. These metrics shape reporting, covenant tests, and in some cases trigger mechanisms that protect senior notes. The market’s renewed confidence in ABS has also been linked to accumulated data depth and a stronger understanding of how aviation assets and structures behave through volatility.

A simple set of metrics tends to do most of the work:
 

Metric

What it tells investors

Collection rate

Whether scheduled cash is actually arriving

Delinquency and arrears trend

How early counterparty stress becomes visible

Concentration limits

Whether the pool is becoming clustered over time

Weighted average lease term

How stable cash flows are over the next few years

Loan-to-value ratio

How much collateral coverage exists against the debt

Utilisation and downtime

Whether cashflow assumptions match operational reality

 

When these metrics are stable and consistently reported, investors can underwrite faster, secondary liquidity improves, and the “capital markets discount” shrinks.

 

Conclusion: If capital were raised tomorrow, would the portfolio narrative hold?

ABS and structured debt are returning because they can provide scale, flexibility, and potentially lower all-in funding costs, but the market is selective. The portfolios that win are the ones with disciplined pool construction, consistent servicing, and disclosure that removes grey areas. If capital were raised tomorrow, would the portfolio narrative hold?

 

FAQs
 

Q. What is “bankruptcy-remote” in a securitisation structure?
A. It means the asset pool is held in a Special Purpose Vehicle that is legally separated from the originator, so investor repayment relies on pool cash flows rather than the originator’s wider solvency.

Q. What does a servicer do in an aviation ABS?
A. The servicer manages collections, reporting, and asset administration under defined rules, and servicing quality is a key focus area for investors in the current market narrative.

Q. What is a cashflow waterfall, and why does it matter?
A. A waterfall is the priority order for distributing collections across expenses, interest, principal, and reserves, including what changes if performance deteriorates.

Q. What is a master trust structure in aviation ABS?
A. A master trust is a platform structure that can issue multiple note series over time from a shared pool, offering financing flexibility and scale where assets meet consistent eligibility criteria.

Q. What makes a portfolio “too concentrated” for ABS investors?
A. It usually means risk is heavily clustered in one aircraft type, one geography, or a small set of counterparties, increasing volatility if a single segment weakens and typically widening pricing.